Whispers of Racism: Analyzing Critical Responses of Chinua Achebe and Edward Said to Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v2i6.73Abstract
This paper explores how African people are viewed and presented in Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness and how this author is charged with racism by Chinua Achebe after fifty years of writing this much-debated text. It also clarifies Edward Said’s critical response to this novella which is considered as a defense of Conrad. Analysing both the responses of Said and Achebe, this research tends to assess Achebe’s allegation objectively and non-judgmentally situating the text more as a product of time than as an instance of racist tale. This paper presents an idea that the authors of postcolonial literature are literally driven to analyze the multi-layered aspects of race and racism that have accelerated a flow of postcolonial novels based on the concept of race, color, sex, and identity. However, this paper also suggests that the presence of race and racism in literary studies occur instinctively and effortlessly although the early responses to Heart of Darkness simply ignored that idea because the literary critics and scholars of that period hardly talked about racism.
References
Achebe, C. (2008). “An image of Africa.” Things fall apart: A Norton critical edition. ed, Francis Abiola Irele. New York: W. W. Norton, 169-181.
Achebe, C. (1958). Things fall apart. London: William Heinemann.
Brantlinger, P. (2006). “Imperialism, impressionism, and the politics of style” Heart of darkness: A Norton critical edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 386-395.
Brooks, P. (2006). “An unreadable report: Conrad’s Heart of darkness” Heart of darkness: A Norton Critical Edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 376-386.
Conrad, J. (2006). The heart of darkness: New York: W. W. Norton.
Crowder, M. (1978). The story of Nigeria. London: Faber.
Gordimer, N. (1990). My son’s story. London: Bloomsberry.
Guerard, A. J. (2006). “The journey within.” Heart of darkness: A Norton critical edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006. pp. 326-36
Fanon. F. (1961). The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove Press
Fanon. F. (1967). Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove Press.
Harris, W. (1981). The frontier on which heart of darkness stands. Research in African Literature 12(1), 86-93.
Hawkins, H. (1982). “Heart of darkness and racism.” heart of darkness: A Norton critical edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 365-75.
Hawthorn, J. (1990). “The women of heart of darkness.” Heart of darkness: A Norton critical edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 405-15.
Miller, J. H. (1996). “Heart of darkness revisited” heart of darkness. Ed, Ross C Murfin. New York: Bedford Books, 206-20.
Morrison, T. (1970). The bluest eye. London: Vintage.
Morrison, T. (2017). Making America white again. Race. London: Vintage.
Ogbaa, K. (1999). Understanding Things Fall Apart: A student casebook to issues, sources, and historical documents. Westport, Connecticut, London: Greenwood Press.
Said, E. W. (1994). “Two Visions in Heart of Darkness.” Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
Shakespeare. W. (1987). The Tempest. London, Paris, New York, Melbourne: Cassell & Company.
Shakespeare. W. (2015). The works of Shakespeare: Othello, Washington: Palala Press.
Torgovnick, M. (1990). “Primitivism and the African woman in heart of darkness.” heart of darkness: A Norton critical edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 396-405.
Walcott, D. (1978). “The sea is history,” The Paris Review.
Watt, I. (1979). “Impressionism and symbolism in heart of darkness.” heart of darkness: A Norton critical edition. New York: W. W. Norton, 349-65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jebun Geeti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJLLS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.