Integrating Form and Meaning in Language Acquisition

Authors

  • Fatma A Suer Algonquin College, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v3i4.111

Keywords:

Form, Meaning, Integration, Language Acquisition

Abstract

Language learning is the process through which people pick up new languages. Form and meaning are two crucial components that must be understood and integrated during this difficult process. Form alludes to a language's structural features. This covers syntax (the study of how words are put together to make sentences), morphology (the study of the internal structure of words), and phonology (the study of the sound system in a language). Form essentially refers to the guidelines and patterns that determine how a language is organized. On the other hand, meaning is related to semantics and pragmatics. While pragmatics studies how context affects the understanding of meaning, semantics is the study of meaning at the word and sentence level. In other words, meaning refers to the interpretation and understanding of these forms (words, phrases). Because it enables learners to comprehend and generate language effectively, the integration of form and meaning is essential for language learning. Learners need to comprehend how these rules are utilized to communicate meaning; it is not sufficient to just know the rules of a language (form). The article will examine how form and meaning are integrated during language learning, explain the difficulties encountered throughout this process (such as the complexity and unpredictability of language), and provide solutions to these difficulties. Various teaching methods, learning techniques, and other tactics that make it easier to comprehend and combine form and meaning when learning a language might be included in these strategies.

 

 

References

DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practising second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge University Press, New York.

Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive development enquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Lee, J. F., & Valdman, A. (2000). Form and meaning in language teaching. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.

Mart, Ç. T. (2019). A comparison of form-focused, content-based and mixed approaches to literature-based instruction to develop learners’ speaking skills. Cogent Education, 6, 1–27.

Mart, Ç. T. (2021). Integrating Form and Content within Classroom Discussions of Literature: A Discernible Advantage in Language Learning. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 7 (1), 51–74.

Mart, C.T. (2021b). Can Metacognition Bring in the Ingredients Requisite for L2 Listening Success? AILA Review, 34(2), 262-273.

Millard, D. J. (2000). Form-focused instruction in communicative language teaching: Implications for grammar textbooks. TESL Canada Journal, 18(1), 47–57.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.

Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50(1), 119–151.

Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012799

Spada, N., & Lighbown, P. M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42(2), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008. tb00115.x

Stringer, T., Looney, K. (2020). The role of metacognition in mindfulness interventions with Japanese EFL university students. Learning: Research and Practice, 7(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1818806

Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners‟ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990519

Downloads

Published

2023-07-01

How to Cite

Suer, F. A. (2023). Integrating Form and Meaning in Language Acquisition. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 3(4), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v3i4.111

Issue

Section

Articles