A Comparative Analysis of Explicit and Implicit Corrective Feedback on Language Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v3i5.126Keywords:
Explicit Corrective Feedback, Implicit corrective Feedback, Language AcquisitionAbstract
The path to linguistic competence in the area of language acquisition is one of discovery, with one's capacity for clear and correct communication always evolving. The key function of corrective feedback, which acts as a compass to direct students toward the shores of linguistic clarity, is at the center of this trip. Corrective feedback is the helpful advice given to students in response to their grammatical mistakes, a lighthouse illuminating the way to skilled language usage. This article begins an investigation into the complex interactions between the explicit and implicit modes of corrective feedback. These modes navigate the complex seas of language improvement with the help of their distinctive methods to mistake repair. We learn more about the various impacts of different feedback techniques on language performance by exploring their subtleties. This essay aims to unravel the effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback, providing light on their capacity to influence language acquisition through an analysis of theoretical underpinnings, empirical research, and pedagogical issues.
References
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Oxford: Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition, edited by A. Mackey, 339-360. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1995). How languages are learned (3rd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1-40.
Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59(2), 453-498.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
Mart, Ç. T. (2019). A comparison of form-focused, content-based and mixed approaches to literature-based instruction to develop learners’ speaking skills. Cogent Education, 6. 1660526. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1660526
Mart, Ç. T. (2020). Integrating listening and speaking skills to promote speech production and language development. MEXTESOL Journal, 44(2), 1–7
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720.
Ortega, L., & Long, M. (1997). The effects of models and recasts on object topicalization and adverb placement in L2 Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 65-86.
Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 10, 393-417.
Willing, K. (1988). Learning strategies in adult migrant education. Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fatma Suer Albay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJLLS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.
