Radical Feminist Study of Ill-Formed Love in Ibsen, Lawrence, Tolstoy, and Williams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v6i1.243Keywords:
Ill-Formed Love, Radical Feminism, Patriarchy, Gender Inequality, Female Agency, Comparative LiteratureAbstract
This paper focuses on how far radical feminism matters accelerate the representation of ill-formed love in Henrik Ibsen, D.H. Lawrence, Leo Tolstoy, and Tennessee Williams. Following a comparative approach to the literature, the research investigates how the authors thematize love not as an idealized force but rather as a complex site of struggle, domination, and resistance, where gender roles are continuously contested. The result is that Ibsen portrays the patriarchal marriage and relationship; Lawrence, the conflicts between sensuality and dominance; Tolstoy, the moral tensions between passion and duty; and Williams, the psychological and social maladies within relationships. These thematizations stand together to unveil deep-seated inequalities and face culturally and socially formed norms of love. By choosing a close literary analysis with radical feminist theory, the research manifests new insights into the ways in which literature reflects and critiques gendered power expositions, thereby demonstrating the contemporary relevance of feminist critique towards human intimacy.
References
Cohn, R. (1977). The garrulous grotesques of Tennessee Williams. In S. S. Stanton (Ed.), Tennessee Williams: A collection of critical essays (pp. 45–60). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Crawford, O. (1891). The Ibsen question. Fortnightly Review, 55, 727–740.
Ibsen, H. (1878). Notes for the Tragedy of Modern Times. In C. Innes (Ed.), A Sourcebook on Naturalist Theatre (p. 70). New York: Routledge.
Ibsen, H. (1964). Letters and Speeches (E. Sprinchorn, Ed.). New York: Hill and Wang.
Ibsen, H. (2006). A Doll’s House (Dover Thrift Edition). Dover Publications.
Ibsen, H. (2006). A Doll’s House (T. M. Crawford, Trans.). Dover Publications. (Original work published 1879).
Illustrations. Bibliography. Index. Hard bound. Slavic Review, 53(4), 1190–1192. https://doi.org/10.2307/2500909
Jones, W. G. (1966). George Eliot’s “Adam Bede” and Tolstoy’s Conception of “Anna Karenina.” The Modern Language Review, 61(3), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/3721492
Kolin, P. C. (1991). A Streetcar Named Desire: The Moth and the Lantern. Theatre Journal, 43(3), 407-408. Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/7117
Kolin, P. C. (2000). Williams: A Streetcar Named Desire. Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, D. H. (1994). Sons and Lovers. (H. Baron & C. Baron, Eds.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1913).
Millett, K. (2016). Sexual politics. Columbia University Press.
Moi, T. (2006). “First and Foremost a Human Being”: Idealism, Theatre, and Gender in A Doll’s House. Modern Drama 49(3), 256-284. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mdr.2006.0083
Peterson, D. E. (1994). Framing Anna Karenina: Tolstoy, the Woman Question, and the Victorian Novel. By Amy Mandelker. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1993. xv, 241 pp.
Radam, H. I. (2017). Feminism in Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House. Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 221(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v221i1.420
Shama, M. S. (2016). The creation of women: A feminist reading of D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4(9), 1117–1119.
Templeton, J. (1989). The Doll House Backlash: Criticism, Feminism, and Ibsen. PMLA, 104(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/462329
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Md Chand Ali, Mostak Hossain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by CJLLS are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits third parties to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon the original work provided that the original work and source is appropriately cited.
