Nora’s Doll Image in Ibsen’s A Doll’s House: A Question of Responsibility

Authors

  • Farhiba Ferdous

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v5i6.246

Keywords:

Torvald Helmer, Nora Helmer, Male Dominated, Tragedy, Freedom

Abstract

Henrik Ibsen, the first major to write tragedy about ordinary people on ordinary situations has brought realism and radicalism of the nineteenth century in his ever appealing play A Doll’s House. Maintaining an individual feminine personality is the main focus, the play deals with. The difficulty is personified by Nora, the doll of A doll’s House. She later strives to become a self-motivated human being in a male dominated society which is far more difficult beyond the imagination of a lady like Nora, the doll of A Doll’s House. This paper aims to study the matter that Nora, the sweet pretty doll, not merely is a victim of the male-dominated society rather mostly a doll of her own mistaken identity. Along with the discussion the paper will also argue on justification of her leaving the house slamming the door after failing to discover the difference between fancy and imagination.

References

Aarseth, A. (1997). Gender Issues in Ibsen’s Plays, The Darling and the Demon: Female Characters in Ibsen’s Drama: Proceedings; IXth International Ibsen Conference, (pp. 9-19). Addendum, Centre for Ibsen’s Studies: Oslo.

Archer, W. (1912). From Ibsen’s Workshop. New York: Longman.

Bhasin, K. M. (2006). What a Patriarchy. Women United, 23(4), 23-30.

Cobuild, C. (2010). Advanced Illustrated Dictionary. Great Britain: Harper Collins Publishers Ltd.

Engels, F. (1940). The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Ferguson, R. (1996). Henrik Ibsen: A New Biography. London: Cohen.

Gamble, S. (2006). The Routledge Companion to Feminism and Post Feminism. London: Taylor & Francis e-library.

Gilliland, M. S. (1894). Ibsen’s Women. London: William Reeves.

Gray, R. (1977). Ibsen, A Dissenting View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hansson, L. M. (1895). Modern Women in English: Henrik Ibsen. Vienna. Bon: University of NachDruck Press.

Hertzberg, N. (1893). Women of Ibsen. Kristiania: Aschehoug.

Ibsen, H. (2006). A Doll’s House. Dhaka: Friend’s Book Corner.

Johnston, B. (1989). Text and Supertext in Ibsen’s Drama. University Park and London: London University Press.

Johnston, I. (2000). On Ibsen’s A Doll’s House. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kaufman, M. (2000). Gender Basics. Feminist Perspectives on Women and Men (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Kiran, M. (2022). Realism in Ibsen’s Plays-A Critical Insight. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 10(10), 925-930.

Marker, F. J., & Marker, L. L. (1989). Ibsen’s Lively Art: A Performance Study of the Major Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McFarlane, J. (1970). Henrik Ibsen: A Critical Anthology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Press.

Rahman, A. (1997). Gender Issues on Ibsen’s Plays, Ibsen: A Passionate Enquiry into Truth. Dhaka: Dhaka University Press.

Templeton, J. (1997). Ibsen’s Women. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, D. (1983). Macmillan Modern Dramatists, Henrik Ibsen. London: Macmillan Press.

Ystad, V. (1997). Women’s Utopia in Ibsen’s Writings. Gender Issues on Ibsen’s Plays, 33(4), 123-135.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-07

How to Cite

Ferdous, F. (2025). Nora’s Doll Image in Ibsen’s A Doll’s House: A Question of Responsibility. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 5(6), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v5i6.246

Issue

Section

Articles